Yes, you are babbling. You’re flailing around so far out of the spectrum of this debate that you’re digging up fourteen month-old articles that have nothing to do with this conversation in order to fallaciously shift the burden of proof onto me. The only reason you keep trying to say “Hurr hurr, you think Hillary Clinton killed Seth Rich hurr hurr” (which is both false and irrelevant) is because that fallacious argument is much easier than providing hard, irrefutable proof that Russia hacked Democratic Party emails and gave them to WikiLeaks, which is what you would need to do to stop losing this debate.
As you already anticipated, your appalling intellectual dishonesty has worn out its welcome here. One of three things will happen in your very next response:
- You will provide hard, irrefutable proof that Russia hacked Democratic Party emails and gave them to WikiLeaks that rises to the level necessary in a post-Iraq invasion world.
- You will admit that you cannot do this and concede that your position is too weak to defend.
- You will be blocked.
Choice is yours.